If you like DNray Forum, you can support it by - BTC: bc1qppjcl3c2cyjazy6lepmrv3fh6ke9mxs7zpfky0 , TRC20 and more...

 

Configuring MySQL for Effective Query Handling

Started by sebco, Jul 06, 2023, 12:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

sebcoTopic starter

Greetings!

Here's the situation: we have two servers running MySQL. Replication is set up, with one server acting as the master and the other as the slave. Our goal is to direct database modification requests (such as INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, etc.) to the master server, while read requests (SELECT) should be directed to the slave. Is there a configuration option in MySQL or a third-party solution that can help us achieve this?

Our project is built in PHP, and unfortunately, we didn't consider this issue beforehand. We are currently using the regular mysql_query for making requests.

Thank you in advance!
  •  


Prefade

MySQL Proxy is an available option that allows for the transparent distribution of connections to the master and slave for the client, albeit with certain limitations. You can find further information on this topic at forge.mysql.com/wiki/MySQL_Proxy_RW_Splitting. It is unfortunate that it is not yet fully ready for production.

On a positive note, one approach to address this is to redirect all database accesses through your class, which can be as basic as performing a search-replace in the source code. By doing so, you can easily analyze whether the access involves reading or writing operations.
  •  

gAjhrSx64

Discussing hetzner and servers. One possibility is to consider www.hetzner.de/hosting/produkte_rootserver/ex5 as an option. It might be worth investing in the setup, as having 24GB of memory instead of 8GB can significantly improve performance, especially when dealing with intensive tasks that heavily rely on cache, such as extensive reading operations.

In addition, it can be advantageous at times to attach a slave server where all the tables are located on a ram disk. The slave server can benefit from having ample RAM, which allows for faster read speeds compared to reading from a regular Windows environment, even when using a 7200 RPM hard drive.
  •  

comdali

If reliability is of utmost importance and even the slightest data loss is unacceptable, then sacrificing performance is inevitable. The typical asynchronous replication method may not be suitable in this case as it cannot guarantee that the data has been successfully transferred to the slave.

One alternative is to use DRDB + Heartbeat, which offers reliability but comes with a performance penalty. It requires a strong network connection between the servers. Another option, for FreeBSD users, is to implement a similar solution using replication at the ZFS level.

In version 5.5, replication with data recording confirmation was introduced, at least for one of the slaves.

If a short-term downtime and minimal data loss can be tolerated (although I must emphasize that neglecting user data is never recommended, especially in sensitive areas like banking and finance), asynchronous replication can be a good solution.

However, it is crucial to monitor the SHOW SLAVE STATUS, for example, using tools like Nagios, to promptly detect any replication failures.

To switch to a slave, you can either configure your application at the configuration level or use a virtual IP that quickly redirects traffic to a live slave in the event of the master's failure.

Nevertheless, relying solely on a standby database to balance queries may not always be ideal. If the master goes down, the workload previously shared by two servers will now fall entirely on a single slave. In such cases, the code should be prepared to disable certain functions to mitigate potential issues.
  •  

avomert

Yes, there is a solution to direct database modification requests to the master server and read requests to the slave server in a MySQL replication setup. You can achieve this by configuring your PHP application to use different database connections depending on the type of query.

One approach is to modify your PHP code to use two separate MySQL connections, one for the master server and one for the slave server. You can use the mysql_query function with the appropriate connection based on whether it's a read or write query.

For read queries (SELECT), you can use the connection to the slave server. For example:

```php
$slaveConnection = mysql_connect('slave_host', 'slave_user', 'slave_password');
mysql_select_db('database', $slaveConnection);

$result = mysql_query('SELECT * FROM table', $slaveConnection);
```

For write queries (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE), you should use the connection to the master server. For example:

```php
$masterConnection = mysql_connect('master_host', 'master_user', 'master_password');
mysql_select_db('database', $masterConnection);

mysql_query('INSERT INTO table (column1, column2) VALUES ("value1", "value2")', $masterConnection);
```

Replace `'slave_host'`, `'slave_user'`, `'slave_password'`, `'master_host'`, `'master_user'`, and `'master_password'` with the actual connection details for your slave and master servers.

Note that the `mysql_query` function is deprecated as of PHP 5.5.0 and removed in PHP 7.0.0. It is recommended to use mysqli or PDO for new projects. The same concept applies to these newer extensions as well.

Also, keep in mind that handling replication lag is crucial when using a master-slave setup, as data modifications made on the master may not be immediately visible on the slave due to replication delays.

In addition to the PHP code changes I mentioned earlier, there are a few other considerations and recommendations to keep in mind when directing queries to the master and slave servers in a MySQL replication setup.

1. Load Balancing: If you have multiple slaves, you can implement load balancing to distribute read queries across them. This can be done using various techniques such as round-robin DNS or using a load balancer proxy like HAProxy or ProxySQL.

2. Connection Management: It's important to handle connection failures gracefully. If a connection to the master or slave server fails, you should have a mechanism in place to retry or switch to a different server.

3. Error Handling: Keep in mind that certain types of queries, like data modification queries, may result in errors if executed on the slave server. You need to handle such cases and possibly retry the query on the master server.

4. Consistency: Remember that the slave may lag behind the master due to replication delays. If your application requires strict consistency, you may need to implement additional mechanisms to ensure that read queries always hit the most up-to-date data.

5. Asynchronous Replication: By default, MySQL replication is asynchronous, meaning there can be some delay in replicating changes from the master to the slave. If you need synchronous replication, you can use the MySQL Group Replication feature or consider other solutions like Galera Cluster.

6. Connection Pooling: To improve performance, consider using connection pooling techniques to reuse database connections instead of establishing a new connection for every query. This can help reduce the overhead of connecting to the database.
  •  

tessa2340

Greetings!

It sounds like you're looking to implement a setup where write operations go to the master MySQL server while read operations are directed to the slave server. This is a common scenario in database replication setups for better performance and load balancing.

To achieve this in MySQL, you can consider using a concept known as "read-write splitting." This involves creating a proxy layer between your application and the database servers, which intelligently routes queries based on their type.

One popular solution for this is MySQL Proxy or ProxySQL. These tools can analyze the SQL queries and redirect them to the appropriate server based on whether they are read or write operations. They provide a way to balance the load and optimize the performance of your database setup.

Since your project is built in PHP and you're currently using the regular mysql_query, you might need to consider migrating to MySQLi or PDO, as the mysql_query functions are deprecated in recent PHP versions. Both MySQLi and PDO offer support for prepared statements, which is a safer way to interact with databases and can be beneficial for the proxy layer to analyze and route queries effectively.

Remember to thoroughly test any solution you implement in a staging environment before deploying it to production to ensure it meets your performance and reliability requirements with newbielink:https://www.janbasktraining.com/online-sql-server-training [nonactive].

Best of luck with your project! If you have further questions or need more specific guidance, feel free to ask.
  •  


If you like DNray forum, you can support it by - BTC: bc1qppjcl3c2cyjazy6lepmrv3fh6ke9mxs7zpfky0 , TRC20 and more...