Hello!

I was wondering about the meaning of "making up with the mouse". Is it really achievable to maintain a contemporary and adaptable layout while doing so?
Personally, I use traditional methods for my layout work such as opening my editor and typing away. However, there are a plethora of editors available both online and offline.

I'm interested in hearing from individuals who utilize specialized editors that assist in simplifying the layout process through clicking. The crux of this discussion is centered around interactive layout platforms.
Note: Constructors are not relevant to this topic.

Regrettably, there have been no tools that can match the quality of manual code thus far. While landing pages can be constructed using constructors with less stringent code requirements, this isn't the case for more complex projects. Of all the platforms I am familiar with, the most effective one is webflow.

Speaking of simplifications, there are various template engines and preprocessors available nowadays. Not only do they minimize the volume of code that needs to be written, but they also offer greater convenience when dealing with data. Essentially, much of the HTML drudgery is eliminated.

The Pinegrow web editor is an exceptional piece of software. Although it isn't free, it's easy to find a pirated version online. It's entirely feasible to create a responsive Bootstrap website devoid of any additional features without even touching the keyboard - all that's required is some class and ID instruction.

PCP's theme code is generated in an efficient manner compared to Themler's equivalent. Furthermore, the site provides some excellent video courses, such as those on creating a portfolio from the ground up. Overall, I messed around with it somewhat and became quite fond of it.

Some of us old-timers, like myself, we prefer the good ol' fashioned way of doing things. You know, crаcking open our trusty old editor, typing away until we get it just right. It's like painting a masterpiece, one line of code at a time. But that's just me, I'm a traditionalist, through and through.

Now, these interactive layout platforms, they're a different kettle of fish altogether. They're for those who want to click their way to a layout, I suppose. Drag and drop this, click and resize that, it's all very... user-friendly. But here's the thing, mate, sometimes too much ease can lead to a lack of control. You might end up with a layout that's as unique as a snowflake in a blizzard. Not that there's anything wrong with that, mind you, but it's not for everyone.

Take these specialized editors, for instance. They promise to simplify the layout process, make it a breeze. But here's the catch: they often come with a steep learning curve. You've got to learn their language, their way of doing things. It's like trying to speak French when you only know English. You might get the gist, but the nuances, they'll elude you.

And adaptability, now that's a funny one. These platforms, they're always updating, always changing. It's like trying to nail jelly to a wall. Just when you think you've got the hang of it, they go and change the rules on you. It's enough to make a grown man weep.

But hey, who am I to judge? If clicking your way to a layout floats your boat, then more power to you. Just remember, there's no substitute for understanding the fundamentals. You might be able to make a pretty picture with one of these platforms, but can you make it work when the going gets tough? That's the real test, mate.
"making up with the mouse" is all well and good, but don't forget about your old friend, the keyboard. They make a pretty good team, you know. And as for maintaining a contemporary and adaptable layout, well, that's a whole other ball game. It's not about the tools, it's about the skills. But