Can we have a conversation about addresses on Telegram?



A considerable amount of addresses were recently cleared, although they did not become available.

Durov proposed the idea of holding an auction for attractive addresses.

Currently, it is feasible to utilize username.t.me as an alternative address format.

It seems there have been recent changes regarding the availability of addresses on the platform. While a large number of addresses were cleared, they did not become immediately available. This could mean that they may become available in the future or that they are being held for specific reasons.

You mentioned that Durov, the founder of Telegram, proposed the idea of holding an auction for attractive addresses. This suggests that Telegram might consider selling desirable addresses to users who are willing to pay for them. This approach could potentially generate revenue for the platform and also allow users to acquire unique and memorable addresses.

Additionally, you mentioned that the format username.t.me is currently being used as an alternative address format. This format allows users to have a personalized username instead of a numerical identifier. It offers a more user-friendly way for others to find and interact with individuals on Telegram.


Here are some additional points about addresses on Telegram:

1. Username.t.me Format: The username.t.me format allows users to create a unique and easy-to-remember address that others can use to find and contact them on Telegram. By setting a username, users can create a personalized address that is more user-friendly and memorable than the numerical identifiers typically associated with Telegram accounts.

2. Clearing and Availability: When you mentioned that a considerable amount of addresses were cleared recently, it suggests that some previously registered usernames may have been freed up. However, keep in mind that just because an address is cleared doesn't guarantee its immediate availability for others to claim. Telegram might have specific rules or policies in place to determine when and how these addresses become available for new users.

3. Auctioning Attractive Addresses: Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, proposed the idea of holding an auction for attractive addresses. This concept implies that highly desirable or sought-after usernames could potentially be sold to interested parties through an auction process. This could make certain addresses available to those who value them the most, while also generating revenue for Telegram.


More details about addresses on Telegram:

1. Address Availability: While the exact details of how and when cleared addresses become available on Telegram are not known, it's possible that they could be reserved for certain purposes or held temporarily before being released to new users. Telegram might have specific rules or policies in place regarding address availability, and they may periodically update or modify these rules.

2. Username Importance: Having a memorable and unique username can be beneficial on Telegram. It helps others find and interact with you easily, especially if they're not familiar with your numerical identifier. A personalized username also adds a professional touch to your profile and can make it easier for friends, colleagues, or clients to reach out to you.

3. Security Considerations: When choosing a username or an address on Telegram, it's important to keep security in mind. Avoid using personal information or sensitive details as part of your username, as it could potentially compromise your privacy. It's always recommended to use a strong and unique password and enable two-factor authentication for your Telegram account to enhance security.

4. Trade-offs of Auctioning Addresses: While auctioning attractive addresses on Telegram might be seen as a way to assign value to certain usernames, it could potentially create a divide between those who can afford to bid on desired addresses and those who cannot. Implementing such a system would require careful consideration to ensure fairness and accessibility for all users.

Adopting such a strategy is quite rational for vast social platforms, among other things. The execution approach is under consideration.

While I don't manage such expansive services, I too occasionally deactivate usernames, freeze accounts, subscriptions, and so forth. Usually, I provide a year's grace period for reactivation.

As an added thought, this practice is a common feature in the current digital ecosystem where user engagement and security are paramount. It's a balance of convenience and necessary precaution.

A good portion, if not more, was usurped from it, it's vital to assess and reckon; the only untouched assets were in his accounts.

On top of that, once reintroduced into the system, these resources will undoubtedly attract the attention of Iranian "cyber occupiers" ready to deploy their software.

Getting hold of anything substantial won't be an easy task for them. Durov, on the other hand, will skillfully hold onto the valuable assets, like credits, perhaps. Been on the market since 2015, yet remain unsold.

It's a fascinating game of power in the cyber marketplace; extraordinary attempts are made to secure the most beneficial offerings while warding off the ceaseless onslaught of savvy virtual prospectors.

Durov's proposal to auction Telegram addresses is a blatant cash grab disguised as innovation. Clearing out addresses without making them available is just a ploy to create artificial scarcity. The alternative username.t.me format is a weak consolation, failing to address the core issue of accessibility.

This auction idea could lead to a scenario where only the wealthiest users can claim meaningful usernames, effectively alienating the average user. Telegram risks losing its grassroots appeal by prioritizing profit over community.