A classifier to assist domainers
___________________________

This is a guide to choosing effective domain names. Here are some categories of domain names:

1. Single dictionary words in popular domain zones like .COM, such as Dron.com, Artist.com, and Rooms.com. Pros: highly valuable and Google-friendly. Cons: often unavailable.

2. Readable and concise abbreviations of words or expressions, such as BBC.com and DNray. Pros: easy to recall. Cons: difficult to obtain in popular domain zones.

3. Two-word combinations of dictionary words, such as BuyAuto, CallTaxi, RepairApartment, PortraitArtist, CoffeeShop. Pros: can be sold lucratively if they are in the .COM zone and relate to a website's content. Cons: not as valuable as single-word domains.

4. Brand names. Pros and cons depend on individual circumstances.

5. Longer phrases with three or more words, such as Plumber or Best WhoresCities. Pros: can be used when better options are unavailable. Cons: too long and hard to sell.

6. Typo domains, such as facrbook.com. Pros: potential for incorrect searches leading to website traffic. Cons: limited applications besides parking and waiting for revenue.

7. Domains containing trademarks, such as Nokia, Carlsberg, and Volvo. Pros: uncertain. Cons: not commonly selected by trademark owners.

8. Creative or made-up words, such as those found in domain evaluation activities. Pros: minimal visibility. Cons: little use except for wasting money.

9. Misspelled words, such as aligarh (a play on the word "oligarch"). Pros: there are some potential uses. Cons: unlikely to be favored by anyone with basic language skills.

10. Non-existent words that combine elements of crooked and creative domains, such as uristika. Pros: none. Cons: not useful for anyone, and therefore a waste of money.

Additional suggestions, comments, and clarifications for this classifier are welcome.

Epitaphs and relevance of classes may not be connected, but I share the view that the classification seems outdated. Here are some categories that I believe are worth looking at:

LLL.de, LLLL.com (including variations L-N-L.com without hyphens, meaning combinations of characters), LLL.net/.org, NNN.de/.net/.org - still available on the reseller market or up for grabs in auction. They can be pricey but may increase in value over time.

If domain values decrease, it may indicate a broader global issue. However, this may not apply to .org and .net domains.

Correct transliteration in .de and .com is still available on the reseller market, but success in selling depends on factors such as the category, frequency, and presence of trademarks.

English dictionaries have little value in .com and are either unnecessary or incredibly difficult to purchase in .de.

Investment in new zones is not advisable. It may be best to follow Sergeich's example and choose something that is argumentatively interesting, then sell immediately.

Taiping is not a suitable occupation for domainers.

Cybersquatting is no longer relevant, as everyone is prepared to fight in court. Small enterprises are also unlikely to pay high prices.

Creativity and brandability are a lottery, not a guaranteed investment. Only popular phrases may yield returns, and they are rarely sold on the reseller market.

Finally, there are countless domains of varying quality that generate passive income for their owners. It is similar to buying 1000 lottery tickets, where it is almost certain that one ticket will win the jackpot over time.

In sorting through my domain portfolio, I identified around 150 different categories. While this may differ from what TS had in mind, my goal was the same: to better understand what I had. I spent considerable time sorting and classifying, but it ultimately became apparent that buyers are primarily interested in whether a domain is for sale or not. My personal opinions about the domain, its origin, and potential use are usually irrelevant.

For example, I thought "pillow" referred to bedding or sleep, but it turned out to be the name of a restaurant that focuses on unique pillows as part of their interior design.

Therefore, domain names can be divided into two primary categories: for sale and not for sale. Other classifications or theories are often fruitless and a waste of time.

Single dictionary words in popular domain zones like .COM, such as Dron.com, Artist.com, and Rooms.com, offer a highly valuable and Google-friendly option, but they are often unavailable. From a design perspective, having a single dictionary word domain can make the branding and logo design for the website standout and be memorable.

Readable and concise abbreviations of words or expressions, like BBC.com and DNray, are easy to recall, but can be difficult to obtain in popular domain zones. From a design standpoint, incorporating an abbreviation into a logo design can be challenging but also creative and memorable.

Two-word combinations of dictionary words, such as BuyAuto, CallTaxi, RepairApartment, PortraitArtist, and CoffeeShop, can be sold lucratively if they are in the .COM zone and relate to a website's content. From a design perspective, creating a logo for a two-word domain can allow for more creative freedom and a stronger representation of the website's content.

When it comes to brand names, the pros and cons depend on individual circumstances. From a design point of view, working with a brand name as a domain name offers the opportunity to align the website's design with the established brand identity.

Longer phrases with three or more words, such as Plumber or Best WhoresCities, can be used when better options are unavailable, but they may be too long and hard to sell. Designing for longer phrases in a domain name can present challenges such as visual hierarchy and readability but can also provide an opportunity for a unique and creative design approach.

Incorporating typo domains, such as facrbook.com, can potentially lead to website traffic from incorrect searches, but their applications are limited besides parking and waiting for revenue. From a design perspective, working with a typo domain may require extra clarity in the design to direct users to the intended website.

Domains containing trademarks, such as Nokia, Carlsberg, and Volvo, present uncertain pros and cons, as they are not commonly selected by trademark owners. Designing for domains containing trademarks would involve ensuring compliance with trademark regulations and considering potential legal implications in the design process.

Creative or made-up words, such as those found in domain evaluation activities, offer minimal visibility and little use except for wasting money. From a design perspective, creating a visual identity for a made-up word domain would require building brand recognition from scratch.

Misspelled words, such as aligarh (a play on the word "oligarch"), may have some potential uses but are unlikely to be favored by anyone with basic language skills. Designing for a misspelled word domain would require careful consideration to avoid confusion and maintain professional credibility.

Non-existent words that combine elements of crooked and creative domains, such as uristika, offer no practical use and are therefore a waste of money. From a design standpoint, building a brand around a non-existent word would be challenging and may not resonate with the target audience.