What do you think about this ranking and its accuracy? Do the results have any impact on the value and practicality of each TLD? Share your thoughts.



Personally, I believe that rankings can be useful in providing a general idea of the popularity and credibility of different TLDs. However, I don't think they should be the sole determining factor in choosing a TLD for your website.

It is important to acknowledge that while some cases are true, they may be based on a very small sample. Moreover, the list of TLDs that make it to this list varies somewhat from week to week.

Spamhaus is an expert organization on spam, whose findings are instrumental in safeguarding about half of all email accounts across the world. Their staff comprised of 38 investigators have been actively working towards reducing malicious actors and spam for over 24 years. As an international nonprofit, their objectives remain neutral and focused on their cause.

They determine the score by comparing the number of 'bad' domains with the total number of active domains (used for email). The percentage calculated as a result of this comparison is then multiplied by the logarithm of the total number of 'bad' domains. More information on this methodology can be found on their website.

Although .surf had some problematic email accounts, the data was limited to only 176 domains. Out of the much larger pool of registered domains, only 270 appeared to be actively used for email.
In addition to the top 10 listed on the website, one can check the percentage and score by selecting any TLD from the pull-down menu. However, unfortunately, the website does not provide the number of active and bad domains for individual TLDs.

The list of worst 10 TLDs predominantly comprises of free country codes and a few new gTLDs with lighter usage. While .cn is currently among the worst, others occasionally make it to the list.

There are several factors to consider when choosing a TLD, such as relevance to your website's content and target audience, brand perception, and search engine optimization. While a ranking may give an indication of popularity, it may not necessarily reflect the value and practicality of each TLD for your specific needs.

For example, a country-specific TLD like .us or .uk may be more relevant and practical for businesses targeting local audiences in those countries. On the other hand, a generic TLD like .com or .org may have broader appeal and recognition globally.

In addition to rankings and relevance, there are other factors that can impact the value and practicality of each TLD. One such factor is trust and credibility. Some TLDs are more recognized and trusted by users, which can positively impact the perception of your website. For example, .com is widely recognized and considered trustworthy, while some newer or less common TLDs may be less familiar to users.

Moreover, the availability of domain names within a specific TLD can also affect its practicality. Some TLDs may have more availability, allowing you to find a desired domain name easily, while others may have limited options, potentially requiring you to compromise on your preferred domain name.

Additionally, search engine optimization (SEO) can play a role in the value of a TLD. While Google has stated that they do not prioritize one TLD over another for rankings, having relevant keywords in the domain name itself can still be beneficial. This means that choosing a TLD that aligns with your website's content or industry can potentially have an impact on SEO.

Overall, rankings can provide some guidance, but it is important to consider a variety of factors when determining the value and practicality of a TLD. By considering relevance, trust, availability, and SEO implications, you can make a well-informed decision that suits your website's needs and goals.

historically, some TLDs have been associated with a higher volume of abusive activities. These include TLDs like .com, .net, and .org, which are popular and widely used.

Moreover, certain country-code TLDs (ccTLDs) have also been noted for being more susceptible to abuse. For instance, .ru (Russia), .cn (China), and .br (Brazil) have had instances of abuse reported in the past.

It's important to note that the presence of abuse doesn't mean that all websites using those TLDs are involved in malicious activities. The majority of websites within any given TLD are legitimate, and registrars and registries work to combat abuse by implementing security measures and policies.