I've been exploring various web technologies to broaden my skill set. Recently, I decided to delve into web development using different frameworks and servers to compare their performance. In my tests, I found that when running on a virtual box with the same allocated resources (1 i7 core and 1 gigabyte of RAM), Yii2 on nginx handled 230 requests per second, while asp.net MVC on IIS managed 900 requests per second when subjected to 100 threads in JMeter.



It's intriguing to see such a significant difference in performance, especially considering that the test scenarios involved simple controllers/methods without any database queries or complex calculations. It raises the question: why is there a tendency to underestimate asp.net MVC and IIS? PHP may benefit from Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation, but doesn't asp.net already have an advantage in terms of readiness?

I'm eager to understand the underlying reasons for the underestimation of asp.net and IIS. Is there something inherently problematic with the IIS server, or are there other factors at play? I believe that constructive discussions could shed light on this issue and help to uncover the nuances that contribute to the perceptions of these technologies.

The results you've obtained are indeed thought-provoking, and they raise important questions about the factors influencing the performance of web frameworks and servers.

When analyzing the reasons for the performance gap between Yii2 on nginx and asp.net MVC on IIS, it's essential to consider various aspects that may contribute to this disparity. Firstly, the underlying architecture and design principles of the frameworks themselves play a crucial role. Yii2, being a PHP framework, operates within the context of the PHP language and its associated features, including JIT compilation as you rightly mentioned. On the other hand, asp.net MVC leverages the robustness of the .NET framework, which brings along its own set of strengths and optimizations.

The choice of web server (nginx for Yii2 and IIS for asp.net MVC) introduces further variables into the performance equation. Nginx is renowned for its efficiency in handling concurrent connections and serving static content, making it a popular choice for high-performance web applications. Meanwhile, IIS, as a part of the Windows operating environment, undergoes continuous improvements and optimizations, but its performance characteristics might differ from those of nginx due to inherent architectural distinctions.

The underlying operating system, virtualization setup, and the specific configurations of both the frameworks and servers could also impact their respective performance profiles. Even subtle differences in how each technology interacts with the underlying infrastructure can yield measurable variations in throughput and response times.

In the broader context, the perceived underestimation of asp.net and IIS may stem from historical biases, community preferences, or comparative benchmarks that may not fully represent real-world scenarios. It's important to recognize that performance is just one aspect of the overall evaluation of a technology stack, and considerations such as developer productivity, ecosystem maturity, and extensibility should also be factored in.

To address the underlying reasons for such underestimation, collaborative discussions involving developers, system administrators, and performance engineers could indeed bring forth valuable insights. By examining these nuances and engaging in constructive dialogue, the community can gain a deeper understanding of the intricacies that influence the perceptions of different web technologies.
The pursuit of performance optimization in web development necessitates a holistic approach that encompasses not only raw throughput metrics but also factors in the broader context of application design, system architecture, and user experience. Your exploration and willingness to probe into these complexities will undoubtedly contribute to the collective knowledge base of the web development community.

Considering the cost, iron is more affordable than skilled programmers who can code in different languages. The speed of 230 or 900 requests per second is insignificant for the majority of websites, such as business card sites, blogs, and online stores. In web development, there's often pressure to deliver quickly, and platforms like railsdjango are more conducive to meeting urgent deadlines compared to Java.

I prefer not to heavily rely on a large workforce, especially when there's a surplus of PCP developers compared to c# developers. It seems to me that the php community is larger. For specific projects like github, twitter, or fb, the focus should be on building a reliable team rather than the programming language used. There are very few tasks that can't be accomplished faster in one language than another, and when traditional languages don't suffice, alternatives like Erlang and Go come into play. Despite this, github seems to function well on the rails.

To sum up, despite testing various options, the Requests Per Second (RPS) is just one of many factors to consider in web development.

You're discussing the comparison between compiled C# code and interpreted PHP. I would suggest replacing the latter with Java, Rust, or Go. I believe the outcomes will be similar. Additionally, as you rightly pointed out, the solution's cost is three times higher at Microsoft, in addition to more complex configuration, maintenance, and vendor binding.
When it comes to deploying a server for Nginx, almost any VPS provider is sufficient, while for Windows, it is again three times more expensive. In conclusion, IIS is neither worse nor better than others. Personally, I haven't been programming for Windows at all (for the past 12 years). Linux and macOS are ubiquitous, both at home and at work, and I don't consider Microsoft to be mainstream.