To select a suitable VPS, many people rely on ratings, but with the vast number of hosting providers, it can be hard to know which can be trusted. There are concerns that some ratings are paid for, so it's important to consider how a rating makes money. In this regard, we'll consider different monetization models.



One model is paid advertising, where banners are placed at a fixed price. Another is advertising through affiliate programs, where the rating owner receives payments for each client who clicks on the banner and signs up for hosting services. Special marks like "Recommend" or paying for a rank rise are also ways to earn money.

However, some ratings don't earn money, while others like to display ads through advertising networks. Occasionally, companies may need to pay to appear on a rating.

To evaluate ratings objectively, we have developed a rating evaluation system based on criteria such as transparent evaluation, availability of technical characteristics assessment and discounts. We've assessed the most popular resources, such as Hosting101 and Hostings.info, earning them 8 out of 11 points. However, expert evaluations aren't always clear, as user reviews may differ.

In second place, we have Hostinghub and Hosters with 7 points out of 11. Hostinghub stands out for authentic reviews through social networks, while Hosters allows only companies that have been around for more than four years to appear on the rating.

In third place are Vpsup, 101poisk, Tophosts, Vps.today, and Hostdb with 6 points each. Only 101poisk has a clear rating system, and Vpsup raises suspicion due to the lack of negative ratings for their leader, who also hosts the whois rating.

Fourth and fifth places are shared by Poiskvps, Tophosting, Hostobzor, Hostgid.net, Hosting fanatic, and Testvps, with 5 and 4 points respectively. Among them, Hosting fanatic's rating system is unclear, and Tophosting has strange behavior when clicking non-existent web hosting providers in the rating.

The study highlights the main issues with rating systems, such as confusing advertising and the lack of data about owners and objective technical assessments. However, hostings.info stands out for their efforts to combat bot reviews by requiring authentic social media accounts.

Poiskvps and Vps.today lost points due to a lack of rating systems, but remain useful tools for finding VPS with specific characteristics. The author asks readers to share their own VPS selection methods and any other ratings they may know of.

Is it worth exploring different types of hosting?
It's pointless to become a hostage to hosting providers' greed by paying for overselling on VPS nodes.
For many, regular virtual hosting is sufficient, and who really needs a dedicated server?

In my personal experience, I utilize Lowendstock without considering ratings, as it offers cheaper options that suit my needs, and uptime isn't a priority for me.

It's important to assess individual needs and priorities when selecting a hosting option, rather than blindly following ratings or overspending on unnecessary features. The variety of options can be overwhelming, but with careful consideration, finding the right fit is possible.

Obtaining trustworthy information about a hosting service provider through rating services can be challenging. Each rating agency has its own agenda, and the most official-looking resources are often the most susceptible to bias. For this reason, I suggest researching hosting providers on public forums and independent sites where real people share their experiences through reviews and answers to questions.

 by seeking out authentic opinions from various sources, one can make a more informed decision about which hosting service provider is right for them. In addition, asking questions or seeking advice from online communities can provide valuable insights and help avoid costly mistakes.

Processor frequencies are crucial for website speed, but most hosting providers only mention "cores" without specifying the GHz. A server with 128 cores may sound impressive, but it's likely divided among too many customers to be useful for anyone.

VPS usually offer 2-2.5GHz cores, while shared plans can offer up to 4GHz frequency for faster site performance. When it comes to disk space, many hosting providers prioritize offering large volumes rather than faster speeds, which may not benefit your site.

What most websites need is higher processor frequency, more memory, and faster disk operations with random access in small blocks. The best options for these needs are SLC, MLC, or Optane, although consumer-grade TLC/QLC drives are increasingly common in mass hosting.

Shared hosting offers full-fledged processor cores and utilizes allocated memory to the maximum potential of your sites, whereas VPS often require additional software and operating systems that can be costly. To make an informed decision about hosting, it's important to consider the specific needs and priorities of your website, beyond just the advertised features.

Customer trust is paramount, and it's essential that our advertising and promotional activities are transparent and genuine. The issue of paid advertising and affiliate programs in rating systems is of particular concern, as it can create bias and compromise the integrity of the ratings.

In my experience, it's crucial to ensure that any ratings we rely on are based on objective criteria and transparent evaluation methods. The presence of technical characteristics assessment and discounts are important factors, but we must also consider the authenticity of user reviews and the credibility of the rating platform itself.

When assessing the various VPS ratings, I pay close attention to the monetization models they use. Ratings that rely on paid advertising, affiliate programs, or special paid rankings may be susceptible to influence from hosting providers seeking to manipulate their position in the ratings. This can lead to a lack of trust from potential customers who rely on these ratings to make informed decisions.

I value ratings like Hostings.info that make genuine efforts to combat fake reviews and ensure that their platform is free from manipulation. Additionally, I appreciate the emphasis on authentic social media accounts as a way to verify the credibility of user feedback.
I prioritize the reputation and trustworthiness of the hosting providers we promote. It's crucial for me to advocate for ratings that are based on fair and unbiased evaluations, as this ultimately benefits both consumers and the industry as a whole. I look forward to hearing from others in the industry about their VPS selection methods and recommendations for reliable ratings.

The performance gain is 4 times faster read and 2 times better write speed. Profvds.com is great web host.
Support replies fast with no delays. Also they have really nice prices for such a level of the service.

For me TOP hosts are: allwebhost.com and hostsailor.com.
They offer excellent customer service, and value for money. It is a relief to be working with them after unsatisfactory experiences with another company.

Choosing the top VPS provider requires considering several key factors. Look for providers with robust infrastructure, high uptime guarantees, and scalable resources to meet your growing needs. Top providers offer reliable customer support, easy-to-use control panels, and a range of operating system options. Consider security features like DDoS protection, regular backups, and SSL certificates. Compare pricing plans, including bandwidth limits, storage, and CPU resources. Popular VPS providers include DigitalOcean, AWS EC2, and Vultr, known for their performance, reliability, and flexible options tailored to different user requirements.

Top hosting providers are: legionbox.com and owned-networks.net.
The customer service is 110% helpful each and every time I have a question or as I am trying to figure out how puzzle pieces fit together. I highly recommend them as a host- because they go above and beyond with their technical support, professionalism, knowledge, and kindness.

Companies pay to be listed, and the "ratings" are just a bunch of marketing fluff. The so-called "experts" are just salespeople in disguise, and their reviews are meaningless. The only way to find a decent VPS is to ignore the ratings altogether and do your own research. And even then, you can't be sure if the hosting company is legit or just a scam.