I recently created a website using Hostinger hosting services, which I am familiar with and find to be convenient, understandable, and with adequate technical support. Since I have created many projects on this hosting service before, I decided to upload a ready-made site via FTP to my host and linked domain, but encountered an error indicating that the username or password was incorrect.
Despite trying to figure out the issue, I was unable to resolve it. Later, I checked my email and found a letter from Hostinger stating that they are increasing the security level of their network and have reduced the number of free hosting accounts for each client to two, and disabled FTP access for all free hosting clients due to phishing reports and complaints.
However, I discovered that I could still upload files using the free File Manager available in the control panel, as long as I register with a different email address and have more than three free hosting accounts. Although free hosting is still available, it seems that uploading anything via FTP is no longer an option. Essentially, users are limited to creating each folder manually and copying files into them a certain number at a time using the file manager in the browser. This can be quite tedious, especially considering that CMS hierarchy can consist of up to eight or more folders with files in length.
If you want more convenience, you will have to pay between $5 to $10 per month. All things considered, I feel that I was misled by promises of free hosting services, only to have them later revoked. I hope this helps anyone who uses Hostinger for web development or has free hosting with them.
It's frustrating and confusing to use this web hosting service. It's difficult to navigate and not user-friendly. One might not run into these issues if they opt for a normal or VPS hosting service.
Essentially, the problem is that unnecessary features were initially provided for free, which set up unrealistic expectations. What was marketed as a "freebie" is actually available on other web hosting services for free.
Hostinger is a well-known hosting company with extensive advertising. As expected, prices for hosting provider services will increase along with the cost of living, including free use. The best option currently available is to choose a hosting company with a free tariff for 5 GB in ftp, but this service may not be available for long.
Overall, my recommendation is to use a paid package from a hosting provider, even if it's just for testing sites. This approach is more reliable and less likely to disappoint than trying to rely on free services with limited capabilities.
Dealing with Hostinger has been both financially and emotionally draining. After transferring the domain name to Hostinger, there were no notifications or information about how to renew it anywhere. Additionally, the renewal button on the site didn't work and support was unresponsive due to overload.
Two weeks later, I was finally able to talk to a manager who billed me for the domain as well as a commission for non-renewal, which was four times higher than the cost of the domain itself. Despite paying the bill, the domain still doesn't work, and I'm back to trying to contact support.
It's frustrating that Hostinger hires managers to handle issues that could be addressed without them, adding an unnecessary layer of commission fees. My experience has been incredibly frustrating and disappointing, and I strongly advise against using Hostinger for important projects. It's better to invest in a more reliable web hosting service and avoid the frustration and stress.
Hi. I myself have been using Hostinger hosting for a long time, I am very pleased with its work. Yes, you need to pay for it to get all the tools for the job, but it's definitely worth it. If you want free hosting, be prepared for a lower level of service right away.
The transition from unrestricted FTP access to restrictions based on security measures can be disruptive, especially for users familiar with the convenience and efficiency of FTP file transfer.
It's important for webmasters and developers to stay abreast of updates and modifications in hosting services, as these adjustments have a direct impact on workflow and site management. The decision to limit FTP access for free hosting clients is a significant shift that requires adaptation to new methods of file uploading and organization.
The sudden restriction on FTP access can pose practical challenges for website creators, especially when dealing with sites that have intricate folder structures or a large number of files. The manual process of creating each folder and copying files into them using the browser-based file manager can be time-consuming and laborious, requiring meticulous attention to detail and potentially disrupting the standard hierarchical organization of content management systems.
While Hostinger's introduction of the free File Manager in the control panel offers an alternative, it comes with its own set of conditions and limitations. The requirement to register with a different email address and maintain more than three free hosting accounts may not align with the preferences and operational practices of all users. Additionally, the manual nature of file management through the File Manager interface may prove to be less efficient and user-friendly compared to traditional FTP transfers.
The option to upgrade to a paid hosting plan, which ranges from $5 to $10 per month, presents a decision point for users navigating the changes in Hostinger's free hosting offerings. Evaluating the trade-off between added convenience and the associated costs is essential for informed decision-making. Some users may find the additional features and ease of use provided by paid plans to be well worth the investment, while others may seek alternative hosting providers that offer more robust free hosting options.
The abrupt removal of FTP access due to security issues is a clear indication of how they prioritize profit over user experience. Encouraging users to rely on a browser-based File Manager for uploads is not only inefficient but also a step backward in terms of usability.
This feels like a classic case of misleading marketing; they need to be upfront about the limitations of their free services.