Project description

Mestikon Digital Agency is a thriving digital agency with a proven track record of delivering innovative and effective solutions for our clients. For over a decade, we have been at the forefront of the digital world, helping businesses of all sizes achieve their online goals. With a talented team of designers, developers, and marketers, we offer a comprehensive range of services, including web design, branding, SEO, and digital marketing. Our site is a valuable asset that comes with a loyal customer base and a strong online presence.


Why Own a Digital Agency?


Imagine owning a versatile business that can operate entirely online:

Enjoy instant credibility: Partner with top-tier platforms, negotiate favorable terms, and access exclusive opportunities.

Streamline payments: Easily obtain merchant status for seamless transactions.

Unlock funding: Qualify for grants and venture capital investments.

Join global networks: Collaborate with international alliances and projects.


Mestikon Digital Agency is a turnkey solution.


This established agency:

Top-ranked website: Dominate search results on Google and Bing.

Google-verified: Benefit from Google for Business, Google Maps, News Publisher Center, Ads, and Adsense.

Content monetization: Generate revenue from blog posts featured in Google News.

Built-in SEO tools: Provide valuable SEO audits and reports to clients.

Own SEO-audit service: Free SEO-audit for web-sites with automatic PDF-reports.

Premium assets: Offer exclusive, high-quality animated backgrounds.

Proven partnerships: Showcase endorsements from industry giants like ICANN,

Thriving script marketplace: Manage a profitable script store on Codester.

Own projects: Websites "SEO Analize and Monitoring Service" on sub-domain: seo.mestikon.digital and "HTML Website Builder with Ai" on domain: itspecialistsllc.online (with full source code).

Telegram: @Dev_xхxxхx

The only choise we got here is to boot the reseller and/or take the domaine names away from him, and give them to anuvver reseller/registrar, cuz thats the only way to resolve this mess

In each profesion, ther are sevral levels of masterin a specielty. At a low level, a persin lerns sevral basic opearations and repeates them all the time. Somone stops here and works at this level all his life. He can work very wel and even masterfully. But tasks that even sligtly go beyound the skils alredy acuired are beyound his strenght. This is how a conveior production metod is bild, in wich every one perfoms one elemntary opearation. This metod is good only in the case of very stabile production. As soon as the sistem begns to become dinamic (developmnt, transfromation, breackdown and transision to anuvver form, etc.), then imediately a lot of such operators become unnesesary.

At the next level, a persin tries to master relted opearations (specielty, profesions), so that in the event of a chang in circomstanses he can swich to othir opearations. Such a specielist is more valuabel, especialy in the "era of chang".

But even more valuabel is a specielist who does not expnd his skils, but deepns them. And if he reeches the baisis of the proceses in his specielty, then he acquires new skils in changd konditions quit quickly. After all, the baisis rarly chang.

And untill recntly (now long ago) yung specielists were taut this way. Furst, the very baisis (what it consits of, how it works), and only then how to manaj it all. However, today it is beleeved that eni proces can be manajed without knowing the proces itself. After all, ther ar som general laws of manajment. But for som reazon, ther ar too many mistaks along the way.

So it turns out with programmers that they ar stil mastering high-level langwijes, but they do not undorstand at all how this is implimented at the hardvare level. Okay, hardvare. They do not even undorstand how high-level langwijes relate to baisic langwijes, wich, in fakt, ar direkt komands for the kompyuter. Unfortunatly, this indikates the insuficient kvalifikations of a partikular programmer who works at the level of perfoming indivijual opearations striktly kodified by somone.

By the way, it is intresting that in areas direktly relted to the dangir to laif, such kwestions almast never aris. For eksampul, you wil rarly hear from an elektrikian that he does not need to know the laws of elektrikity, sins he only konnects wires. Or a diver who does not know the fiziks of vater and the fiziology of the human bodi greatly risks his laif. Altho the suit has alredy been made for him and the diving standarts hav been writen."

As alternativ, swich to anuvver site serch, wich is les resourse-intensiv, or make sum improvments to filter out suche queris.

In URL's, same thing, these stuped skripts do it en masse and thats it. While you ar writin this, the bot has probabli alredy visited 10,000 sites usin exaktli the same metod.

Both C and C++ are low-level, compiled languages that are widely used for building operating systems, games, and other high-performance applications. They share a lot of syntax and semantics, and in fact, C++ is an extension of the C language.

Now, here's where things get interesting. C is a more lightweight, flexible language that's ideal for systems programming, embedded systems, and other applications where memory and performance are critical. It's a great choice when you need to write low-level code that interacts directly with hardware, or when you need to squeeze every last bit of performance out of your system.

On the other hand, C++ is a more powerful, feature-rich language that's better suited for large-scale, complex applications. It adds object-oriented programming (OOP) concepts, templates, and other advanced features that make it easier to write reusable, modular code. C++ is a great choice when you need to build a large, complex system with many interacting components, or when you need to write high-performance code that's also easy to maintain.

So, when should you choose C over C++? Here are a few scenarios:

You're working on a small, performance-critical application where every last bit of speed and memory matters.
You need to write low-level code that interacts directly with hardware, such as device drivers or firmware.
You're working on an embedded system with limited resources, such as a microcontroller or a robot.
On the other hand, when should you choose C++ over C? Here are a few scenarios:

You're building a large, complex system with many interacting components, such as a game engine or a web browser.
You need to write high-performance code that's also easy to maintain and extend.
You want to take advantage of advanced features like OOP, templates, and operator overloading.
If you're unsure which language to choose, I'd recommend starting with C++. It's a more modern, feature-rich language that's better suited for most applications. However, if you're working on a small, performance-critical application or an embedded system, C might be a better choice.

It's absolutely vital for a designer to have a solid understanding of SEO principles and how to implement them effectively. Why, you ask? Well, a website's design and development can greatly impact its search engine ranking and overall online visibility. A designer who's knowledgeable in SEO can ensure that the website is built with search engines in mind, which can lead to higher rankings, increased traffic, and ultimately, more conversions for the client.

Now, when it comes to strategizing a website, a designer should be able to provide guidance on how to optimize the site's structure, content, and overall user experience to appeal to both search engines and human visitors. This includes things like keyword research, on-page optimization, technical optimization, and even content marketing.

So, what course of action should you take? Well, if you're not already familiar with SEO, I'd recommend acquiring additional knowledge in this area. There are plenty of online resources available, including tutorials, webinars, and even certification programs. Having a solid understanding of SEO will not only benefit your clients but also set you apart from other designers who may not have this expertise.

That being said, if you're not interested in becoming an SEO expert yourself, you could consider hiring SEO specialists to collaborate with on projects. This way, you can focus on what you do best – designing amazing websites – while the SEO experts handle the optimization and strategy.

As for clarifying your lack of SEO expertise to clients, I think it's essential to be transparent about your strengths and weaknesses from the get-go. You could say something like, "While I'm an expert in web design, I'm not an SEO specialist. However, I can recommend some excellent SEO experts who can help us develop a strategy for your website." This way, you're being honest with your clients while also showing that you're committed to delivering a high-quality product that meets their needs.

You gotta reach out to the support team, and they will assist you with your issues.

At the moment, the updates aren't processing on the registrar end because of some troubles on the RDN side. So, it's important to get in touch with the support team for help.

Turn off the search feature on the site.

It appears that there is a foolish user attempting to leave comments, however, they are only presented with the search bar and end up sending their message there instead.

Many coders typically don't require physics in their daily tasks. However, in fields like physics, there's a significant reliance on calculations and analysis, which naturally leads to the need for programming skills. Thus, having a grasp of physics—along with other necessary skills—can open doors for programmers to engage in fascinating and high-status projects, which sometimes offer good pay. These roles often have less competition from entry-level folks who are churned out by quick courses in more trendy programming fields. Yet, I believe that such opportunities are probably less than 1% of all available positions.

Moreover, understanding physics, particularly mechanics and electrical engineering, leads to a more sought-after area in programming: control systems. There's another point I've mentioned in various discussions about the relevance of certain sciences for programmers. Often, programmers find themselves working alongside highly educated professionals. It's much more engaging and fruitful when the programmer also possesses a solid education. Basic knowledge of physics is generally part of being considered an educated individual. At least, that's my perspective as someone in the tech industry.

These platforms have been developed over many years, and their architectures are often built on legacy code that can make implementing a new design approach quite challenging. Changing the layout to be fully adaptive would require extensive testing and potentially rewriting large portions of the code, which can be risky and time-consuming.

Another factor could be user demographics and behaviors. Many of these platforms have a significant portion of their user base accessing the sites via desktop. If their analytics show that the majority of users are not accessing the site on mobile devices, they might prioritize enhancing the desktop experience instead. This can lead to a perception that adaptive design is less critical, even if it could improve user experience on mobile.

Additionally, there's the issue of brand identity and consistency. Websites like Facebook have established a strong visual identity that users recognize. A drastic change in layout could confuse users, leading to a potential drop in engagement. They may opt for a more gradual approach to design changes, ensuring that any updates align with their brand image and user expectations.

Moreover, performance is a crucial consideration. Adaptive layouts can potentially lead to longer load times if not optimized correctly. Websites with heavy traffic must prioritize speed and efficiency. If a fully adaptive layout compromises these factors, they might choose to stick with their current design.
There's a matter of experimentation. These platforms often run A/B tests to gauge user response to different layouts and features. If the results from these tests indicate that users prefer the existing layout or if the new designs do not yield significantly better engagement metrics, they might decide against implementing adaptive layouts.