Naturally, ASP.NET MVC holds greater relevance. Notwithstanding, ASP.NET WebForms may still prove useful as numerous ongoing projects continue to employ it for maintenance and finalization.
(https://www.seguetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/segue-net-web-forms-vs-mvc.png)
It is worth noting that while ASP.NET MVC is the more contemporary framework, ASP.NET WebForms still has its uses and advantages. For instance, certain legacy applications may benefit from its robust event-driven programming model and extensive library of controls. Ultimately, the choice between these frameworks depends on the specific needs and circumstances of each project.
Initially, I acquainted myself with MVC. However, during my employment, I discovered that the development process was centered around WebForms. Despite my personal aversion to WebForms, many companies continue to rely on this framework. Therefore, it may be beneficial for you to familiarize yourself with it in order to expand your skillset and marketability.
Instructing ASP.NET MVC and its accompanying WebAPI (to replace WCF if desired) is highly recommended, especially for corporate solutions.
However, in older companies where initial projects were developed using WebForms, it may still be prevalent. In addition, understanding design patterns such as GoF, dependency injection, inversion of control, and object-oriented programming is essential for any development project.
Personal preference aside, creating websites with pre-built, tested components is easier to accomplish in WebForms due to its robust component development capabilities. In contrast, achieving this level of modularity in MVC can prove challenging due to its focus on linking to URLs. Furthermore, SharePoint, a popular platform within many corporations, relies entirely on web forms.
On a broader scale, it is important to recognize that Microsoft is a business and will continue to develop and promote new frameworks as long as there is demand. As developers, we must constantly adapt and stay informed about these changes to make optimal choices for our projects. Ultimately, the end result remains the same regardless of which framework we use.
ASP.NET Core and ASP.NET MVC are two different versions of the ASP.NET framework with distinct differences.
ASP.NET Core was released as a free and open-source web development platform by Microsoft in June 2016, and is optimized for cross-platform use. It can be used for developing websites or desktop applications that can be deployed on any operating system. In contrast, ASP.NET MVC can only be used for Windows applications.
In terms of popularity and preferences, ASP.NET Core is the clear winner. The platform is designed for creating web applications and APIs optimized for use with ASP.NET Core. It uses the latest web standards and supports TDD-friendly development. The framework is open source, testable, and contains many functions such as routing, model binding and validation, web API, view components, razor view engine and more.
The benefits of ASP.NET Core include improved performance, cross-platform support, less code, easy maintenance, support for cloud web applications, open source code, hosting, and better security. Any professional ASP.NET Core user can access the framework code, allowing developers to create better web solutions.
Overall, ASP.NET Core is an excellent choice for businesses and organizations looking to create high-performance, secure, cross-platform web applications.
The choice between ASP.NET MVC and WebForms depends on the specific needs and goals of your project.
ASP.NET MVC is a more modern and popular framework that promotes a separation of concerns, making it easier to test, maintain, and extend your code. It follows the Model-View-Controller architectural pattern, allowing for greater control over the HTML output and supporting clean, modular code.
On the other hand, ASP.NET WebForms provides a more event-driven and component-based programming model, which can be beneficial in certain scenarios. It offers a rich library of server-side controls and allows for rapid development using drag-and-drop functionality. WebForms is often used for legacy applications or projects where rapid development and ease of use are top priorities.
considerations to help you make a decision between ASP.NET MVC and WebForms:
1. Control and flexibility: ASP.NET MVC provides more control over the HTML output, making it easier to create responsive websites and optimize performance. It allows for cleaner separation of concerns, which can lead to better code maintainability and testability. WebForms, on the other hand, abstracts away many of the complexities of web development, providing a higher level of abstraction and ease of use.
2. Learning curve: ASP.NET MVC has a steeper learning curve compared to WebForms. MVC relies on understanding the concepts of routing, controllers, and views, which can take time to learn if you're new to the framework. WebForms, with its event-driven model, may be easier for developers who are more familiar with desktop application development.
3. Community and resources: ASP.NET MVC has gained significant popularity over the years, resulting in a larger community and abundant resources such as tutorials, dоcumentation, and third-party libraries. WebForms also has an established community, but it may not be as actively expanding or evolving.
4. Compatibility and support: Both frameworks are supported by Microsoft, but it's worth noting that future enhancements and improvements may be more focused on ASP.NET MVC, as it is considered the modern successor to WebForms.
5. Project requirements: Consider the specific requirements of your project. If you need speed and simplicity for rapid application development, WebForms may suit your needs. However, if you prioritize clean architecture, testability, and scalability, ASP.NET MVC might be a better fit.
more factors to consider when choosing between ASP.NET MVC and WebForms:
1. Separation of concerns: ASP.NET MVC follows a clear separation of concerns by separating the application logic into models, views, and controllers. This can make it easier to maintain and test your codebase compared to the tightly coupled nature of WebForms.
2. Performance and scalability: ASP.NET MVC tends to be more lightweight and performant compared to WebForms. Its focus on clean HTML output and flexibility allows for better optimization and scalability, especially for high-traffic or resource-intensive applications.
3. Front-end development: If you have front-end developers in your project who prefer working with modern JavaScript frameworks like Angular or React, ASP.NET MVC might be a better fit. MVC provides greater control over the front-end and allows for seamless integration with these frameworks.
4. Customization and extensibility: ASP.NET MVC is known for its extensibility and flexibility, allowing developers to customize and extend various aspects of the framework. This can be useful if you have specific requirements or need to integrate with third-party libraries or tools.
5. Long-term support: While both frameworks are supported by Microsoft, there may be differences in the level of investment and future updates. ASP.NET MVC is considered the main focus for Microsoft's web development efforts, indicating that it may receive more long-term support and updates compared to WebForms.